Why can’t we participate in the media frenzy? Dr. Roberts phrased his talk by saying that
this is a technological revolution or a trend that cannot be countered. In other words, the ship has left the
port. The increase in exposure and media
use has drastically grown over the past fifteen years and the types of media
keep evolving for young people. But why
can’t we, as teachers, employ this media to our own advantage?
Dr. Roberts made the correlation between large media
exposure and use and a lower academic achievement with students. Students that use over sixteen hours have
dramatically lower grades and successful habits. While it may take a societal effort to change
that sixteen hour clip down to the reasonable seven or eight, we should employ
strategies built within this trend to reach the students. It seems to me that teachers should fight for
this media time and immerse themselves in this independent world that students
are creating for themselves. This does
not mean that teachers have to try and entertain the student at all hours of
the day, but the allowances and resources of the internet and computers are
vast. Educational material and programming
is very accessible.
As the internet invades the television, it ability for
teachers to assign television or viewable programming will improve. Most PBS and many other educational
documentaries are accessible on YouTube and fifteen-minutes of a video and some
additional reading is a way to include media resources that students could
adapt towards. Discussion boards and wikis can be easily
accessed so that students can participate in social activities that are focused
towards the curriculum. Many secondary
math classes are already working with a flipped or modified flipped classroom
that let students use the power of stop and rewind lectures for increased
retention. Why can’t this be done with
other interactive materials while requiring discussion on an online forum?
Of course this sounds great in this spacious ivory tower. But there is still the problem of multiple
exposures and the constant flipping of cognitive functions that prevent problem
solving. I’ve got no clue on that one.
More Pupils Are Learning Online, Fueling
Debate on Quality
How does one model behavior through a computer screen? How do they problem solve difficult tasks and
compromise with other humans to create not-perfect, but manageable solutions? These seem to be just two of the glaring
problems with a comprehensive transition into “online learning”. Although, through using the technology
responsibly and with an inquiry focus, it could reap benefits and reach motivated
students in ways that the typical classroom cannot.
Young people learn from their exposure to other people. If a student has 40% less exposure to
responsible adults, they will have 40% increased influence from other
factors. This could be peers or it could
be media on the computer used during instruction. Additionally, very few people remember the
specific skills or content information gained in grade school. They may use this information to build other
important information later in life, but the skills are only sometimes
retained. Yet the relationships,
motivations, and resiliencies created during school last must longer. I find it very difficult to believe that
student can make as serious relationship with instructors who have to construct
their responses to fit into a digital communication.
But there are also great opportunities here. I love ordering and taking course from “The
Learning Company”. It’s how I get
through, and look forward, to my commute every day. These courses have a wide range of topics
that would allow students to invest an opinion and choice into their secondary
education. What if administrators required
that students take one online course every year, but required these to be
elective classes where students could pick something of interest. This would prevent cheating during the core
academic areas and allow students an endless variety of course material that
could help build critical thinking and organizational skills all the while
preparing them for a university culture.
Technology Resources for the Teacher:
Props to Josie for this compilation of tech tid-bits. I’ve already made a series of vocabulary
terms on quizlet and made them into three different flash card games, two
testing sequences, and a review. I’ve
posted these cards onto our course webpage and linked it up for students. They can now spend five minutes a night
trying to compete with themselves and other classmates regarding who can match
the terms fastest or master the terms without error. Sweet!
I’ve also downloaded the cool timer and screen catch
applications. A lot of the freeware for
these materials cause complications and these two seem to be pretty solid. I love that the clock runs directly off an
.exe and therefore doesn’t have to be downloaded onto the fascist district
network.
Hi Jon, It's good to finally read your post. I agree that teachers should utilize the internet to their advantage in the classroom. I do worry about the misuse of the internet. All technology should be used to enhance teaching, not to replace it. Teachers should not feel a need to constantly entertain students. I agree that technology has its strengths for teachers and sometimes substantial ones, but (as with the frequent misuse of power point) it can lead to lazy teaching that is not real teaching at all.
ReplyDeleteI know there are some excellent online classes, but I think it is more often a "sterile" and "solitary" experience for the student. To make it work, the instructor needs to make the class accessible, challenging, creative and make the student accountable. If these things are present, online education could work for a part of a student's class load. I like your idea of having online classes for electives - allowing students to pursue a topic perhaps not even taught in school. That would be interesting and even exciting, but, once again, would need to be structured so that students gained something substantial.
Patti